Pistol Brace ruling from ATF released.
- Suck My Glock
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 9844
- Joined: May 25th, 2018, 3:01 pm
- Reputation: 8
- Location: Peoria
- Tenring
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: June 2nd, 2018, 10:13 am
- Reputation: 7
- Location: Cave Creek
Re: Pistol Brace ruling from ATF released.
Just remove the brace and your good to go!
- YNOTAZ
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: June 3rd, 2018, 10:01 am
- Reputation: 9
- Location: NW Valley
Re: Pistol Brace ruling from ATF released.
The Pistol brace ruling was published last night. That starts the 120-day clock
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- ... -01001.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- ... -01001.pdf
- Suck My Glock
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 9844
- Joined: May 25th, 2018, 3:01 pm
- Reputation: 8
- Location: Peoria
Re: Pistol Brace ruling from ATF released.
Rep. Andrew Clyde to Use Congressional Review Act to Override ATF Stabilizer Brace Rule
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fw ... ce-rule%2F
The Brookings Institute summarizes the Congressional Review Act:
Passed as part of the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, the Congressional Review Act creates a streamlined procedure by which Congress can disapprove and thereby nullify regulations promulgated by various federal government agencies. The Congressional Review Act quires that all rules be reported to Congress. Upon receiving that report, Congress then has 60 legislative working days (which is generally a much longer period than 60 calendar days) to introduce a special joint resolution of disapproval of the rule.
That resolution can be discharged from committee and can avoid the Senate’s filibuster, thereby empowering Congress to contend with the administrative state’s vast rulemaking powers on something closer to an equal footing.
The U.S. Government Accountability Office explains the Congressional Review Act thusly: “The Congressional Review Act allows Congress to review ‘major’ rules issued by federal agencies before the rules take effect. Congress may also disapprove new rules, resulting in the rules having no force or effect.”
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fw ... ce-rule%2F
The Brookings Institute summarizes the Congressional Review Act:
Passed as part of the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, the Congressional Review Act creates a streamlined procedure by which Congress can disapprove and thereby nullify regulations promulgated by various federal government agencies. The Congressional Review Act quires that all rules be reported to Congress. Upon receiving that report, Congress then has 60 legislative working days (which is generally a much longer period than 60 calendar days) to introduce a special joint resolution of disapproval of the rule.
That resolution can be discharged from committee and can avoid the Senate’s filibuster, thereby empowering Congress to contend with the administrative state’s vast rulemaking powers on something closer to an equal footing.
The U.S. Government Accountability Office explains the Congressional Review Act thusly: “The Congressional Review Act allows Congress to review ‘major’ rules issued by federal agencies before the rules take effect. Congress may also disapprove new rules, resulting in the rules having no force or effect.”
- schiffer99
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 130
- Joined: May 18th, 2018, 4:19 pm
- Reputation: 6
- Location: Tucson
Re: Pistol Brace ruling from ATF released.
LOL! That is funny. I hope I don’t end up in that van.
- Tenring
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: June 2nd, 2018, 10:13 am
- Reputation: 7
- Location: Cave Creek
Re: Pistol Brace ruling from ATF released.
"it attempts to retroactively criminalize law-abiding Americans"
https://thefederalist.com/2023/01/17/wi ... to-felons/
https://thefederalist.com/2023/01/17/wi ... to-felons/
- deadshot556
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 225
- Joined: June 7th, 2018, 10:15 am
- Reputation: 1
- Location: phoenix
Re: Pistol Brace ruling from ATF released.
They never will.kenpoprofessor wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 5:11 pmThere's much you don't understand, I'll let you figure it out.sonofbp wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 4:51 pm
The f*** are you on about. Do you have a point? Implying I''m a boot licker for registering something would imply that you either comply by not owning anything that would need to be registered or own w/e the f*** you want, wont comply with s***, and are mocking anyone who does.
Which is it? Are you the coward you claim I am or are you bragging about non-compliance?
You b**** about all the pussies on this board then claim I'm defamitory... come the f*** on man
And I don't know or care what you do or dont own. I just dont understand the trolling bs.
Clyde
- AZHTfreak
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 222
- Joined: January 7th, 2020, 9:55 am
- Reputation: 0
- Location: NW Phoenix
Re: Pistol Brace ruling from ATF released.
Well hell, AZ is one of these states - jump to 3:20...
13-3101 definitions 8.(iv)
https://azleg.gov/ars/13/03101.htm
13-3101 definitions 8.(iv)
https://azleg.gov/ars/13/03101.htm
- Tenring
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: June 2nd, 2018, 10:13 am
- Reputation: 7
- Location: Cave Creek
Re: Pistol Brace ruling from ATF released.
Yup - state law might cause an issue.
Last edited by Tenring on February 12th, 2023, 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.