Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
This is the place to post your news and reviews on anything that's firearm related (rifles, magazines, ammo, barrels, holsters, training classes, optics, etc). Please try to make the reviews as thorough as possible and include pictures, or links to pictures if possible, as well as price(s). Some syndicated content will go here as well.
MADISON, Wis. (WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRESS RELEASE) - Attorney General Josh Kaul has joined a coalition of 19 other attorneys general in supporting the state of California’s efforts to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines within its borders. The coalition filed an amicus brief Wednesday in support of California in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court, arguing that California’s prohibition on the possession and sale of large-capacity magazines is consistent with the Second Amendment to the Constitution.
Joining Attorney General Kaul in this amicus brief are the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawai’i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.
"As a native-born Arizonan who has resided in this state for 58 years, I have seen a wide variety of legislative and judicial efforts from both sides of the political divide over that period. However, you take the cake with this blatant effort to corrode our right to bear arms by signing the amicus brief supporting the state of California to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines. You have lost my confidence, support, and vote for any future endeavors."
Limper wrote: ↑December 3rd, 2023, 7:18 am
My statement,
"As a native-born Arizonan who has resided in this state for 58 years, I have seen a wide variety of legislative and judicial efforts from both sides of the political divide over that period. However, you take the cake with this blatant effort to corrode our right to bear arms by signing the amicus brief supporting the state of California to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines. You have lost my confidence, support, and vote for any future endeavors."
Really??? He never had, nor will he ever have your support, why use these terms as a euphemism? Just tell him he's a lying, dog faced, pony soldier and he needs to go back and play ASSstronaut.
Clyde - Unfortunately, it's a game. If you send them a message like you're suggesting, they know that you were one that never had their support to begin with and they won't care. If you send a message like the one Limper wrote, you come off as someone who may have been a supporter (and they know they had a narrow election victory), and now they have lost support and a vote.
When you post things to these sites you aren't really speaking to the Speaker. Probably just an intern who will log the responses under "positive", "negative", or "neutral". The Speaker will probably just get a blip in a brief about the nature and number of responses on this issue. I chose to respond like Admin:
Reach out to the AG office and voice your displeasure of them signing on to this on behalf of AZ.
Let them know that they have lost your confidence, support and vote (not that any of us voted for her).
You use whatever words make you feel better Clyde and I will leave you the last word if you feel like responding. Thanks OP for bringing the issue to my attention.
Limper wrote: ↑December 3rd, 2023, 7:18 am
My statement,
"As a native-born Arizonan who has resided in this state for 58 years, I have seen a wide variety of legislative and judicial efforts from both sides of the political divide over that period. However, you take the cake with this blatant effort to corrode our right to bear arms by signing the amicus brief supporting the state of California to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines. You have lost my confidence, support, and vote for any future endeavors."
Really??? He never had, nor will he ever have your support, why use these terms as a euphemism? Just tell him he's a lying, dog faced, pony soldier and he needs to go back and play ASSstronaut.
Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day
Clyde
Curious; do you have Mayes confused with Mark Kelly?
Limper wrote: ↑December 3rd, 2023, 7:18 am
My statement,
"As a native-born Arizonan who has resided in this state for 58 years, I have seen a wide variety of legislative and judicial efforts from both sides of the political divide over that period. However, you take the cake with this blatant effort to corrode our right to bear arms by signing the amicus brief supporting the state of California to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines. You have lost my confidence, support, and vote for any future endeavors."
Really??? He never had, nor will he ever have your support, why use these terms as a euphemism? Just tell him he's a lying, dog faced, pony soldier and he needs to go back and play ASSstronaut.
Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day
Clyde
Curious; do you have Mayes confused with Mark Kelly?
Both of them are jackoffs, but yea. Kelly is supporting the bill in Congress right now.
