Page 1 of 1

UVALDE TX. LAWSUITS

Posted: November 29th, 2022, 8:58 am
by xerts1911


DANIEL DEFENSE ALSO BEING NAMED IN THE SUIT

Re: UVALDE TX. LAWSUITS

Posted: November 29th, 2022, 3:37 pm
by omegaman
Only one person at fault is the trigger man. Yet these greedy lawyers will try and sue any one with any money.

Re: UVALDE TX. LAWSUITS

Posted: November 29th, 2022, 10:18 pm
by Miker12
In 2005, Jessica Gonzales sued Castle Rock, Colorado police for failing to arrest her husband, who had violated a protective order, resulting in the murder of her three children. Her case went to the U.S. Supreme Court in The Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, where she lost because even though the order required arresting her husband upon violation, then-Justice Antonin Scalia successfully argued that “a well-established tradition of police discretion has long coexisted with apparently mandatory arrest statutes.”

This case builds upon Supreme Court precedent in Deshaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (1989). In that case, a young boy was repeatedly abused at the hands of his father, something that county Social Services was aware of, but made no effort to remove the child. His mother sued once the four-year old entered a vegetative state, and the Court ruled that that the state did not have a special obligation to protect a citizen against harms it did not create.

https://prospect.org/justice/police-hav ... he-public/

Re: UVALDE TX. LAWSUITS

Posted: November 30th, 2022, 4:15 am
by kenpoprofessor
Miker12 wrote: November 29th, 2022, 10:18 pm In 2005, Jessica Gonzales sued Castle Rock, Colorado police for failing to arrest her husband, who had violated a protective order, resulting in the murder of her three children. Her case went to the U.S. Supreme Court in The Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, where she lost because even though the order required arresting her husband upon violation, then-Justice Antonin Scalia successfully argued that “a well-established tradition of police discretion has long coexisted with apparently mandatory arrest statutes.”

This case builds upon Supreme Court precedent in Deshaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (1989). In that case, a young boy was repeatedly abused at the hands of his father, something that county Social Services was aware of, but made no effort to remove the child. His mother sued once the four-year old entered a vegetative state, and the Court ruled that that the state did not have a special obligation to protect a citizen against harms it did not create.

https://prospect.org/justice/police-hav ... he-public/
Yep, that's why qualified immunity shouldn't exist at all, and that is just another court precedent, not law. This creates a paradox of vigilante vs Police. We can do little and still be charged. They, can murder with impunity.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

Re: UVALDE TX. LAWSUITS

Posted: November 30th, 2022, 6:43 am
by XJThrottle
Miker12 wrote: November 29th, 2022, 10:18 pm In 2005, Jessica Gonzales sued Castle Rock, Colorado police for failing to arrest her husband, who had violated a protective order, resulting in the murder of her three children. Her case went to the U.S. Supreme Court in The Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, where she lost because even though the order required arresting her husband upon violation, then-Justice Antonin Scalia successfully argued that “a well-established tradition of police discretion has long coexisted with apparently mandatory arrest statutes.”

This case builds upon Supreme Court precedent in Deshaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (1989). In that case, a young boy was repeatedly abused at the hands of his father, something that county Social Services was aware of, but made no effort to remove the child. His mother sued once the four-year old entered a vegetative state, and the Court ruled that that the state did not have a special obligation to protect a citizen against harms it did not create.

https://prospect.org/justice/police-hav ... he-public/
We are living in a different world now.

Alex Jones got rung up for a Billion bucks for his opinion.

Re: UVALDE TX. LAWSUITS

Posted: November 30th, 2022, 8:33 pm
by xerts1191
IMG_6618.JPG

Re: UVALDE TX. LAWSUITS

Posted: December 1st, 2022, 6:20 pm
by AZHTfreak
They shouldn't hold their breath, DD sure as shite ain't Remington, though that LGS probably won't survive the shyster's fees... Couldn't find which jurisdiction these were filed in...

Re: UVALDE TX. LAWSUITS

Posted: December 2nd, 2022, 8:34 am
by BigNate
It's time for the gun manufacturers to file countersuits against these anti-gun groups asserting whatever legal premises cover the damages done to them by these frivolous lawsuits. If the law does not allow this - then we need to work through the legislatures to protect businesses from this sort of harassments.

Re: UVALDE TX. LAWSUITS

Posted: December 2nd, 2022, 11:52 am
by xerts1191
Yes