California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
-
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 545
- Joined: February 24th, 2019, 11:15 am
- Reputation: 4
- Location: East Side
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
I don't recognize this judges authority.
Next.
Next.
- Pipedoc
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 467
- Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:49 am
- Reputation: 36
- Location: Payson
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
it get's worse, now it heads to the 9th circuit court. Nothing good comes out of the 9th circuit SMH
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
What part of "shall not be infringed" doesn't she understand ? Seems pretty clear to me.
- toyhunt
- New to ArizonaShooting.org
- Posts: 10
- Joined: February 8th, 2019, 11:58 pm
- Reputation: 0
- Location: flagstaff
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
Discriminating against physical problems with gun owners. My hands are an issue ,using a non semi would be an issue trying to reload every time.
- weenis
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 140
- Joined: August 12th, 2018, 3:08 pm
- Reputation: 0
- Location: Northern Arizona
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
All you people should move back.
- baja
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 856
- Joined: June 25th, 2018, 10:18 am
- Reputation: 13
- Location: Mesa
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
This "judge" is obviously not a judge but just a biased political appointee.
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
Only in Cali. The wall is being built in the wrong location IMO
- AR-15Man
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 291
- Joined: January 17th, 2019, 6:22 pm
- Reputation: 5
- Location: Phoenix
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
Don’t give them ideas, there is enough censorship on the internet already.
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
So....
since the state and local police are not federal.... then every semiautomatic Police issued firearm they possess.... NEEDS to be confiscated. By their own damned stupid rules.
But that'll never happen.
since the state and local police are not federal.... then every semiautomatic Police issued firearm they possess.... NEEDS to be confiscated. By their own damned stupid rules.
But that'll never happen.
- Az desert rat 1
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 239
- Joined: June 12th, 2018, 8:30 am
- Reputation: 0
- Location: Glendale
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
Wish I could remember his name. A few years ago a Federal Supreme Court judge put the 2A in plain English. He stated that the 2A covers all firearms and that the right to bear arms can not and will not be infringed on.
- samnev
- ArizonaShooting.org Member
- Posts: 751
- Joined: May 15th, 2018, 8:27 am
- Reputation: 4
- Location: Surprise, AZ
Re: California Judge Rules Semiautomatic Rifles Not Covered By 2nd Amendment
Does anyone expect any difference when its a judge in California. Not me.Doc Holliday wrote: ↑July 28th, 2019, 7:03 am 'Josephine Stanton, an Obama appointee'....Liberal woman, that pretty much says it all right there. Pray that you never have your case assigned to that thing, you'll lose every time.
These judges don't care anymore, they just keep banning everything and hoping something sticks.
