Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

This is the place to post your news and reviews on anything that's firearm related (rifles, magazines, ammo, barrels, holsters, training classes, optics, etc). Please try to make the reviews as thorough as possible and include pictures, or links to pictures if possible, as well as price(s). Some syndicated content will go here as well.
User avatar
samnev
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 752
Joined: May 15th, 2018, 8:27 am
Reputation: 4
Location: Surprise, AZ

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#46

Post by samnev »

It's about time someone put the hammer down on CTD. Well done TX AG.


User avatar
Crippledtrigger
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1326
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 2:20 pm
Reputation: 1
Location: AZ. via TX.

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#47

Post by Crippledtrigger »

All the "it's free market" and "your stupid not to have bought when it was cheap" screamers should read the AGs filings. This is about actual gouging practices and not price changes with market fluctuations.

If you dont have all the info you are ignorant of the facts and should consider looking smart thru silence. The issues aren't that prices went up as the supply tightens as that happened everywhere, i.e. free market, and many of their price increases were not the issue.

Things that were at issue were the price advertised and final price at payment were almost doubled. Prices manually raised after government declarations when no increase in cost or other market fluctuations were shown. In other words actual gouging. When Texas listed Ammo as a necessity they should have got the hint. One could say this is mostly deceptive business practices I guess.

This is only a half million dollar hit to them and only to refund actual victims of these limited practices cause many of their price increases, as stupid high as they are compared to other retailers, didnt rise to that level. That said they closed a store front after the last shortage cause locals hate them and I hope they suffer a nice funeral pyre soon, figuratively ofcourse.

Anyways the actual AGs filings are easily found if anyone cares to look.

Oh, a fool and his money...

And

Piss poor preperation on your part...
User avatar
Flash
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 2497
Joined: May 16th, 2018, 1:56 pm
Reputation: 5

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#48

Post by Flash »

Yeah, if people actually paid the inflated price, I don't feel sorry for them.
User avatar
thom
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1422
Joined: May 20th, 2018, 10:49 pm
Reputation: 23
Location: chandler, near IKEA

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#49

Post by thom »

Supply and Demand! But any a**hole can sue for any reason.
User avatar
Gunslinger808
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 771
Joined: May 3rd, 2018, 5:58 pm
Reputation: 3
Location: Florence

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#50

Post by Gunslinger808 »

So, someone’s failure to properly prepare shouldn’t cost them?
I guess anyone that feels that way should sell me their precious metals at 1970 prices (Gold $35.xx per Troy ounce).
User avatar
Rock Hardson
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 863
Joined: June 30th, 2018, 12:51 pm
Reputation: 11
Location: Arizona

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#51

Post by Rock Hardson »

20201218_192057.jpg
I can understand raising prices a little, because who knows how long it will be before you get more Pmags (or ammo, firearms, etc.) from the manufacturer, but this is ridiculous to do to your customers. It shows just how much CTD values their customers.

Fu/ck Cheaper Than Dirt. I hope they fold up like a wet taco shell and blow away.
User avatar
AZHTfreak
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 237
Joined: January 7th, 2020, 9:55 am
Reputation: 0
Location: NW Phoenix

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#52

Post by AZHTfreak »

Screenshot_20210203-105306_Samsung Internet.jpg
Aaaaand the new king of price gouging is...
alamoammo.com
Stupid pricing for stupid people. Check out the Federal HST .38 SPC $/rd...
User avatar
mtptwo
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 618
Joined: October 9th, 2018, 1:38 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: West Mesa

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#53

Post by mtptwo »

2.80 for a round of 147gr 9mm? That is laughably sad.
User avatar
Suck My Glock
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 10526
Joined: May 25th, 2018, 3:01 pm
Reputation: 8
Location: Peoria

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#54

Post by Suck My Glock »

Well,...it IS HST, after all. I've been hunting for 147 grain 9mm JHPs myself to load up. I've seen people paying $1 per PULLED projectile!! Virgin HST 147 grainers go for more than that. So factory loaded 9mm 147 HST,...I'm not surprised. Certainly not worth THAT much, but I can see it.

Just secured the winning bid on 1000 pieces of Remington 147 JHP grainers at $.25 cents each. That's almost double what I would have paid a year ago, but awesome these days.
User avatar
Old Jeff H
ArizonaShooting.org Bronze Supporter
ArizonaShooting.org Bronze Supporter
Posts: 985
Joined: February 28th, 2020, 4:14 pm
Reputation: 9
Location: Glendale, AZ

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#55

Post by Old Jeff H »

Gunbroker is certainly winning with this situation. I can't even imagine what they're making from the fees.
User avatar
Manitu
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1102
Joined: May 22nd, 2018, 6:33 pm
Reputation: 1
Location: Mesa

Re: Cheaper Than Dirt sued---price gouging

#56

Post by Manitu »

curtmini14 wrote: April 10th, 2020, 4:39 am
Elk34 wrote: April 5th, 2020, 5:09 pm :dance: Sue the sh!t out of them. :dance:
tell me the difference between you and CTD did you not try and sell mywall reloads 1000 rds for a 1000 dollars.can you say hypocrite. :dance: truly a richard
He did! like others doing that my reaction: noted ....forever.
Post Reply