Latest Actions by Biden's KGB Against Gun Owners

[XJThrottle]

Pay a fee, submit fingerprints and forms, take a class, and have your personal information entered into a database to get your CCW and you’re a “real” gun owner. Pay a fee and submit fingerprints and forms for a SBR and you’re a “collaborator” or “fudd.” Makes sense.

Ah, I was wondering when our local Democrat would pop in.


Clyde

Is there a flaw to his logic in regards to this post? Don't recall anyone getting bashed for getting a CCW/CWP. It's typically promoted. Concealed carry is a constitutional right WITHOUT all the steps, yet are praised by getting the check mark from the man. What's the difference here?

[kenpoprofessor]

Pay a fee, submit fingerprints and forms, take a class, and have your personal information entered into a database to get your CCW and you’re a “real” gun owner. Pay a fee and submit fingerprints and forms for a SBR and you’re a “collaborator” or “fudd.” Makes sense.

Ah, I was wondering when our local Democrat would pop in.


Clyde

Is there a flaw to his logic in regards to this post? Don't recall anyone getting bashed for getting a CCW/CWP. It's typically promoted. Concealed carry is a constitutional right WITHOUT all the steps, yet are praised by getting the check mark from the man. What's the difference here?

Well, I'm just gonna let you guys figure this out, or, even guess what a huge difference there is. If you want it to be the same, well, god bless your lttle pea pickin' heart.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

[YNOTAZ]

Is there a flaw to his logic in regards to this post? Don't recall anyone getting bashed for getting a CCW/CWP. It's typically promoted. Concealed carry is a constitutional right WITHOUT all the steps, yet are praised by getting the check mark from the man. What's the difference here?

Just my opinion BUT HELL YEAH.

Our entire landscape is tipped left to the falling off point and they are asking for compromise and common-sense gun control.
Fist bump stocks, then arm braces, then binary triggers, then anything that “enhances the fire rate of a firearm, then “high-capacity magazines”, then “assault weapons”, do we at least write in and exhibit our resistance or do we wait until another 1776 is the only method to get back where we should be today.

Oh yeah and pay a $200 fee so we can stay in our own state, unless we have papers.

Yep, let's roll over now and hope they scratch our tummies and not cut out balls off.

That's what wrong with the post.

[XJThrottle]

I wasn't saying it's OK that it is done. Just how is it different?

Why is it OK paying for a class to get a signature, spend another $60+ to send off a document with all your info and finger prints, to get a license you don't need in the first place to do what it implies.

But, not OK (you're giving into the man) to spend a similar amount of money overall, to essentially send out all the same info to get a license (tax) for something that you feel shouldn't be required....but is.


One man, voluntarily paying for something that is free.
The other man, voluntarily paying for something that should be free...but isn't.

Are they both fools?

[kenpoprofessor]

Much cognitive dissonance is the norm for them apparently.

Clyde

[jls in az]

Hopefully, we can get a NFA case before the Supreme Court while it still has a conservative majority. The NFA was held as Constitutional in the 1930's because it didn't affect "military style" firearms that were suitable for "militias" at the time. Remember, at the time NFA was challenged, the K98, Springfield 03A3 and SMLE were the top of the line for the world's militaries. The US military, and most other countries, didn't use short-barreled rifles, SMG's, SBS's, fully automatic rifles, or silencers, only bolt action rifles. I doubt the same thing could be said in court today.

[TheAccountant]

Is there a flaw to his logic in regards to this post? Don't recall anyone getting bashed for getting a CCW/CWP. It's typically promoted. Concealed carry is a constitutional right WITHOUT all the steps, yet are praised by getting the check mark from the man. What's the difference here?

Just my opinion BUT HELL YEAH.

Our entire landscape is tipped left to the falling off point and they are asking for compromise and common-sense gun control.
Fist bump stocks, then arm braces, then binary triggers, then anything that “enhances the fire rate of a firearm, then “high-capacity magazines”, then “assault weapons”, do we at least write in and exhibit our resistance or do we wait until another 1776 is the only method to get back where we should be today.

Oh yeah and pay a $200 fee so we can stay in our own state, unless we have papers.

Yep, let's roll over now and hope they scratch our tummies and not cut out balls off.

That's what wrong with the post.

I think you read the wrong post.

[YNOTAZ]

I think you read the wrong post.

Nope he asked if there was a flaw to AZ11----'s logic and I responded. I could have been overtly sarcastic and said, what logic but I said: rolling over and doing nothing because you will likely loose insures that you will loose.

But I'm on AZ---'s ignore list because snowflakes can't handle contrary opinion whether they are right or wrong. Their narcissism demands that they be right ergo, ignore.

[YNOTAZ]

For all of the Non-Fudds, if you are in terested:

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/save-the ... ycoalition

[oldslurrydog1]

Entertaining thread for sure, but I think that XJThrottle has a point.

[kenpoprofessor]

Entertaining thread for sure, but I think that XJThrottle has a point.

Of course you do, I wouldn't expect any less.


Clyde

[oldslurrydog1]

[Jack Dupp]

Is this the softer, gentler Clyde 2.0? I would have expected Clyde to offer up an arse-kicking before the end of the 2nd page! Where is Clyde 1.0 and what have you done with him??

[TheAccountant]

I think you read the wrong post.

Nope he asked if there was a flaw to AZ11----'s logic and I responded. I could have been overtly sarcastic and said, what logic but I said: rolling over and doing nothing because you will likely loose insures that you will loose.

But I'm on AZ---'s ignore list because snowflakes can't handle contrary opinion whether they are right or wrong. Their narcissism demands that they be right ergo, ignore.

So then the answer is yes, you read the wrong post.

[kenpoprofessor]

Having the appearance of being right even under false pretenses, seems to be a bigger priority for our resident clique of Walter Mitty-minded boomer-gentsias rather than being authentic, accurate, honest, and being truthful about the subject.

Can two opposing views be correct at the same time and still peacefully coexist? Yes.

Is this often recognized? Nope!

Differences can cause growth, being petulantly stubborn will never do anything and this thread even with the professor that professes his ignorance 24/7, proves it.

In how many years have the same fudds argued relentlessly with same three persons favoring stocks and paying for it, were able to change the same three minds? Zero.

In how many years has the same clique of cantankerous boomy-boomers were able to change anything with the developments in DC that harms our freedoms, by wanting to infight with us? None.

This is what my friends in law enforcement or doing private detective work, would call a clue.

Don't be hatin', we can't help you're a spoiled little millenial or GenXr who expects everything to be handed to them. That statement alone describes why you believe the way you do. If you'd like to attempt to match intelligence, I'd be happy to set up a debate sometime non professor.

Go on, grab your participation trophy and go away now.

Clyde