


AZ1182 wrote: ↑June 8th, 2021, 5:36 am Bragging about your narcissism after I block you under the pretense of idiocy, is laughable at best. It still won't prove anything because it does nothing really, just like your entire fallacy game with me.
And speaking of which, not answering my questions shows your lack of any integrity because doing so would fully admit that you were wrong the entire time so again, narcissism.
See ya!
(I never click on ignored persons, because that would be stupid as they have nothing to contribute other than hostility and are toxic to us as a whole)
Bub-bye now.
Cubiclerevolt wrote: ↑June 8th, 2021, 11:24 am It's being pragmatic.
There's a whole thread dedicated to NFA items. I am sure I can go walk in there and find the same names posting here as well as in there. Are those people any less 2A supportive?
Does arguing over who's name looks better written in piss in the snow help anyone?
I haven't been paying attention to any of this because they are going to do what they want to do.
I have 2 choices if I was in this camp. The same 2 that you all have.
1. Comply.
2. Not Comply.
Like Clyde said, simply writing to them enables them to know where you stand.
knockonit wrote: ↑June 8th, 2021, 12:11 pm lol, big issue is not who or what its who believes in the 2A rights, and how far are they willing to go to protect it, problem with most sites like this and its members, imo is, while most are ''gun guys, owners ect'' , most will not take the time to review and or get involved in any thing remotely controvercial in regards to ''rights'' in general. They hope someone else will pick up the baton and move it forward, and while they cheer but do nothing else, whether monetary support, or chasing down politicians to confront and discuss, hell even throwing a few bucks to the local group AZCDL, i'd venture to say less than 5% of the folks on this site are even members, and since the ''nra'' is no longer a threat, locally we will have to fend for ourselves,
of course all of this is speculation on my part, but one can tell by discussion and the numbers the rights group post, its a dismal percentage for sure,
i know will get some flack, and its okay, cause fair weather folks are like that. just saying
Rj, and today i don't give a shiat.
kenpoprofessor wrote: ↑June 8th, 2021, 12:45 pm
90% of the "gun owners" I talk to have never heard of the AZCDL, and for that, they should be ashamed to call themselves anything but a "casual" gun owner. It's always easier to ride the coat tails to victory while doing nothing.
Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day
Clyde
Ah, I was wondering when our local Democrat would pop in.TheAccountant wrote: ↑June 8th, 2021, 3:15 pm Pay a fee, submit fingerprints and forms, take a class, and have your personal information entered into a database to get your CCW and you’re a “real” gun owner. Pay a fee and submit fingerprints and forms for a SBR and you’re a “collaborator” or “fudd.” Makes sense.
YNOTAZ wrote: ↑June 7th, 2021, 9:58 pm He's content in feeling there is nothing that can be done so just leave him alone to roll over on his back and see if the ATF scratches his tummy or cuts his balls off.
Or maybe, he gets lucky and the ATF just shortens the chain a couple more links until next time.