Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

Discuss rifles, carbines, and other long-arms here (AR-15's, AK's, etc...)
User avatar
Cubiclerevolt
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1113
Joined: April 12th, 2020, 8:31 pm
Reputation: 2
Location: Glendale, AZ

Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#1

Post by Cubiclerevolt »

"The best thing about MLOK rails is the fact you can install whatever you want on the rail without taking the whole thing off."

False.

I don't know why people keep stating this lie over and over again. In order to get it to tighten you have to apply a cresent wrench to hold it in place. Everything I've added I have had to remove the rail and do the steps as above, which is the opposite of what I had to do with picatinny ones.

I dunno, maybe I am missing something here.


User avatar
knockonit
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 3549
Joined: May 23rd, 2018, 3:23 pm
Reputation: 23
Location: Phoenix,

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#2

Post by knockonit »

yip imo
rj
User avatar
Brlux
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 207
Joined: November 29th, 2018, 6:03 pm
Reputation: 2
Location: Mesa AZ

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#3

Post by Brlux »

You may be missing something, The proper nuts have a cam on them so that when tightening once they rotate 90 deg they lock in the slot and quit turning. It can be difficult to get them set in the slot if your screw is long, it may require pulling the accessory away from the gun to get it locked properly while tightening the screw. You also want to verify the nut did rotated 90 deg after insertion. I have had some installs where it did not rotate before tightening and the accessory could be yanked out.

It is probably not a cut and dry easy as they make it sound but it is definitely doable.

I have never had to use an additional wrench on the nut or take the rail off.
Last edited by Brlux on March 30th, 2021, 9:29 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Dauph
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 5947
Joined: May 21st, 2018, 8:21 pm
Reputation: 3
Location: Peoria

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#4

Post by Dauph »

Slimmer design but would have taken MLOK over keymod.
User avatar
XJThrottle
ArizonaShooting.org Bronze Supporter
ArizonaShooting.org Bronze Supporter
Posts: 2900
Joined: June 26th, 2018, 5:43 pm
Reputation: 7
Location: Phoemex

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#5

Post by XJThrottle »

Only issue I've had with MLOC is on thinner guards. The nuts can hit the barrel when installing. It's not like removing the guard is a PITA though.
User avatar
RufusXG
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 109
Joined: February 6th, 2021, 11:19 am
Reputation: 1
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#6

Post by RufusXG »

My preference is keymod, but it looks like mlok is going to eventually win out. I guess I can live with that but it would be nice if keymod remains well-supported for the long haul.
User avatar
Basher
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 990
Joined: May 15th, 2018, 9:07 pm
Reputation: 13

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#7

Post by Basher »

Yep, just you, LOL.

MLOK installs take a little finesse at first, but once you get them down like Brlux stated, they’re as solid as they’re going to be while also maintaining a slimmer, lighter rail. Keymod is like a cheese grater if you don’t use rail covers and/or gloves, worse even than Picatinny IMO. They all work, but MLOK is the superior system if you’re going for slim/light.
User avatar
Ballistic Therapy
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: June 18th, 2018, 4:05 pm
Reputation: 2
Location: Pima County

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#8

Post by Ballistic Therapy »

I haven't had any problems whatsoever with the MLOK.
They work just like they say they will.

Here is a video that shows an easy way to do it.
So easy a caveman can do it.

QuietM4
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 2142
Joined: May 15th, 2018, 8:36 pm
Reputation: 12
Location: Tempe

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#9

Post by QuietM4 »

It's just you.

If you can't figure out MLOK, I have concerns about the rest of your life.
User avatar
TheJediknight
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 184
Joined: May 18th, 2018, 1:04 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Phoenix
Contact:

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#10

Post by TheJediknight »

My old school Bushmaster still has a quad rail on it....
User avatar
Cubiclerevolt
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1113
Joined: April 12th, 2020, 8:31 pm
Reputation: 2
Location: Glendale, AZ

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#11

Post by Cubiclerevolt »

Ballistic Therapy wrote: March 30th, 2021, 8:07 pm I haven't had any problems whatsoever with the MLOK.
They work just like they say they will.

Here is a video that shows an easy way to do it.
So easy a caveman can do it.

Ooooooooooooooooh!

LMAO I watched another video where the magpul guy was just spinning the t nut in place at shot show and I was like "um, it's not working like that." Now I see that it has to be tightened all the way down.
User avatar
rockbronco
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 483
Joined: August 21st, 2018, 10:40 am
Reputation: 2
Location: Peoria

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#12

Post by rockbronco »

I just recently ended up with something that has mlok on it rather then a rail. I built all my previous at stuff back before mlok was popular so they have quad rails on them. Mlok isn’t a bad setup just have to get the hardware set right which is pretty simple.
User avatar
Cubiclerevolt
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1113
Joined: April 12th, 2020, 8:31 pm
Reputation: 2
Location: Glendale, AZ

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#13

Post by Cubiclerevolt »

QuietM4 wrote: March 30th, 2021, 8:45 pm It's just you.

If you can't figure out MLOK, I have concerns about the rest of your life.
I'm actually doing ok.

My mom brings me hot pockets and snacks whenever I need them and I have no rent or bills.
User avatar
TheJediknight
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 184
Joined: May 18th, 2018, 1:04 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Phoenix
Contact:

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#14

Post by TheJediknight »

rockbronco wrote: April 3rd, 2021, 8:05 am I just recently ended up with something that has mlok on it rather then a rail. I built all my previous at stuff back before mlok was popular so they have quad rails on them. Mlok isn’t a bad setup just have to get the hardware set right which is pretty simple.

In 2021, I would consider other options.
I would not pick quad rail or cheap plastic.
That quad rail has been on the Bushmaster over 10 years.
The cheap plastic has been on the COLT over 10 years.
User avatar
TheJediknight
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 184
Joined: May 18th, 2018, 1:04 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Phoenix
Contact:

Re: Is it just me or is MLOK way overhyped?

#15

Post by TheJediknight »

AZ1182 wrote: April 1st, 2021, 10:24 am
TheJediknight wrote: April 1st, 2021, 10:08 am My old school Bushmaster still has a quad rail on it....
I still have a Stag Arms M4 carbine gas with a DD Omega quad. Extra bonus triggering because it has an F block too. The horror, the horror.

It still works better than the cheap PSA non CHF mlok rifles that I've been seeing with some issues.
I wanted the STAG back in the day. I couldn't afford it back then. I got the Bushmaster for like $600. The STAG was $1000.
Post Reply